Friday, July 27, 2012

Cell phone ban: predictably useless

You could have seen this coming a mile away.

Everyone it seems, but the well meaning do gooders at the helms of transportation and traffic safety policy in BC who never seem to miss a beat when it comes to new ways to justify their existence and in doing so... just happen to find ways to extract money from you. Cell phone bans don't work. I wrote about this in 2009 and 2010. And from the land of unintended consequences comes the revelation that cell phone bans may actually exacerbate the problem as drivers tend to talk longer while on hands free. Remember, the studies show it's the act of engaging in phone conversation which causes cognitive distraction that's the issue, not the operation of the phone.

Lets see, we've ordered our state run disinformation corporation ICBC to spend millions of dollars spreading the word that "Speed is Killing Us" and spent billions of dollars to build highways meant for speed. We've lulled drivers into complacency and clobbered them into compliance. The result? Drivers are reading books, brushing their teeth, eating lunch, putting on makeup, changing diapers, basically anything but focus on the road, on some of the best and most expensive roads in the world.

It stands to reason they're also going to text and phone. Why? Because they can.

Human beings are naturally programmed to be efficient. Driving in BC, hell Canada for that matter (where speed limits are concerned), is a joke. You know the old saying to the employees of McDonalds "if you've got time to lean, you've got time to clean"? Well guess what, there's plenty of leaning going on these days on our roads... and lots of cleaning by your police. Problem is they are helping the highwaymen in Victoria clean out your wallet.

Not a week goes by when you don't see some unremarkable video like this one about some allegedly reckless act, some of which would be considered normal speed in other countries, of driving a high performance sports car or sportbike on a road in BC in order to justify the new found fetish of the police, which is impounding vehicles. Actually, they are impounding lots of shitty vehicles too. But the high end sports car seizures from young rich asians play particularly well to the streak of proletariat meanness and socio economic envy that is so prevalent here. Thank god we don't have anything more important to deal with in BC. They (cops) are pretty bold these days too. Virtually every one of the announcements, it seems, accompanies the news that the police will be forwarding the file to the BC Civil Forfeiture Office for some state sanctioned theft of property.

Theft? Did I say theft? Why yes, yes I did.

Theft is the dishonest taking of property or depriving the owner permanently of its possession. Why are the CFO confiscations "theft"? Because the BC Civil Assets Forfeiture Act was sold to gullible British Columbians that it was being introduced as a means of recovering ill gotten gains from hardened criminals. That's not what is going on here at all. So it's dishonest activity coming from an office that is self funding (read profit center) and it's no accident that it's looking to diversify its reach. Hence, we've got some serious problems on our roads.

Anyway, I digress.

Ponder these questions: Do you think a driver on a race track is making phone calls? Do you think someone driving the autobahn at 240 kph is looking in the mirror putting on her lipstick? No, and the answer as to why is obvious. However, for the crowd in Victoria, here's the answer: because driving when there are no margins for error results in concentration like there's no tomorrow.

It's a blindingly simple concept really.

Until the bar is raised in BC, instead of lowered to accommodate the inadequacies of the lowest common denominator, we are going to see more and more distracted driving. While it's true that higher speeds, in the event of a crash, increase carnage and injury, it's important to realize crashes happen at any speed and the odds of a crash increase as distraction increases. The goal should be crash prevention and not focused almost exclusively on damage mitigation as it is and has been.

I've said it all along and I will say it again, micro managing drivers is not the answer. Raise the bar, people will rise to it and in doing so they will (generally) do what's right.

Hello, may I speak to Victoria please?

7 comments:

  1. Alright! Somebody that has right idea! Lets make it HARDER to get a licence,and I say if when you go to renew your drivers licence you have some infractions on your record,that you have to RE-QUALIFY to KEEP your licence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "because driving when there are no margins for error results in concentration like there's no tomorrow."

    my fav sentence. good one, tad on a scary side. the idiots (mpps) will say though: we can't have people driving on the edge like that, we say: "we're not asking for unlimited, just 130", and so it goes on and on... blah blah....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Boo fricken hoo... Idiots have killed people and cost us all money in insurance payouts and emergency responses, but you go on about the poor innocent people who knew the risks, ignored them and got caught. The bottom lone is that all the idiots have caused this crackdown and it is incumbent upon the government to taka action, so they have done so. Now, we all know the deal when we set out driving. Screw around with it, ignore the risks, get caught and pay the price. The only ones who are really mad about it are the drivers who think they are better than they are. Want to drive fast? Sign up for track days, there are lots of them and they are way cheaper than losing your car. Besides, you might finally learn that you are not as good as you think you are...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't disagree there is some bad behaviour on roads and it should be punished. However, the arbitrary number for seizure is 40k over and in most cases, when we have to deal with speed limits that in many cases could be set 10, 20, or even 30k higher .... sorry but seizures for 40k over become laughable. I'd be interested in what you think is too fast. Or are you one of the majority of liars that claim they obey highway speed limits in BC?
      In terms of who disagrees, that's easy. They are all voting with their right feet and it's pretty obvious nearly everybody thinks they are better than they are. Track days... excellent idea. More people should do them.

      Delete
  4. Frankly I was shocked when I saw that the police had confiscated these Porsches for doing 130 on Sea to Sky! That road has been a killer in the past, but it has been improved to the point where speeds in sections can realistically (safely) be raised to accommodate higher speeds. Now, I don't currently own a car, but when I was a regular driver I was quite cognizant of the fact that some of our speed limits were a mere money grab rather than safety nets. I remember years ago reading about The OPP ticketing SLOW drivers in the left lane of 401 and the like and thinking that was quite proactive and a modern way of thought. Good for them! On the other side of the coin, when I am on my bike and I get buzzed at twice the speed going over Granville Bridge, that is dangerous driving and should be punished heavily. Maybe our drivers are not not mature enough or haven't been driving long enough to accommodate an increase in speeds on roads that might/should be increased, but seizing their vehicles for that speed is nothing more than legalized theft.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I drive in BC these days as little as possible. Last week a friend of mine drove me to Whistler in a German sedan. I sat in the back seat and enjoyed the view. Periodically I looked at the speedo. Travel speed ... somewhere always between 100 and 120 (speed limit 80). Occasionally touching 130. Dangerous? Complete crock of BS. Nearly everybody is at risk of losing their cars and thousands of dollars in fines, points and fees. Every new confiscation equals one owner plus friends and family that should be furious with this government (excluding those that really were driving dangerously of course).

      Delete